Areas of Focus:

Question: What kinds of legal wrongdoings or disputes can I bring to court in Ontario?

Answer: In Ontario, the kinds of issues that may be litigated typically fall into common dispute categories like breach of contract, construction disputes, debts and liens, employment-related claims, realty disputes (including failure to disclose or deposit issues), and tortious conduct (civil wrongdoing that can give someone the right to sue).   Because courts and adjudicators often manage cases by subject area, having a paralegal team at Anderson Aylwin Begg & Co. who can quickly map your facts to the correct claim type can improve precedent research, sharpen submissions, and help reduce unnecessary time and cost.   If you want to understand which path fits your situation, call (905) 686-8080 for a practical Ontario intake with Anderson Aylwin Begg & Co..

Add this website to Google Preferred Sources

Understanding the Types of Issues/Wrongdoings that May Be Litigated

The body of law is much too large for any individual person to ever know in full.  Indeed, even highly experienced judges with decades of experience will be without full knowledge of the law and are therefore, usually, assigned to handle a narrow focus of cases that are within areas of law that are familiar to the judge.  Even so, judges will routinely expect representatives for the parties to perform precedent research and then provide submissions and present argument based upon the findings of that research.

Note: Please contact Anderson Aylwin Begg & Co. by phone at: (905) 686-8080 to discuss any specific questions that you may have.

“... I include myself among those who had never heard of the tort of barratry ...”
~ C.A. Osborne A.C.J.O.
McIntyre Estate v. Ontario, 2001 CanLII 7972 (ON CA)

It is common for adjudicators to be assigned matters within defined subject areas based on experience and familiarity with the issues that most often arise in those proceedings.  In a similar way, legal practitioners tend to focus their work within particular practice areas that align with the types of disputes they most frequently handle across courts, tribunals, and other decision making bodies.  While every case turns on its own facts, legal systems have developed over centuries, and truly novel legal issues are relatively uncommon, meaning established legal principles and precedent will usually exist to guide the analysis and outcome.  Engaging representation that is closely aligned with the specific issues in dispute can improve strategic focus, enhance the quality of legal research and argument, promote procedural efficiency, reduce unnecessary costs, and strengthen the overall likelihood of a well-reasoned and favourable result.